Reflection and Evaluation

Michele Martin, one of my fave bloggers, has a great post today on Reflective Practice. Both reflective practice - that is the process of reflecting on what you do, and how you do it, as well as conscious, deliberate evaluation of projects, are things that are not very common in our field, nor things that are valued or encouraged. In many ways, we are focused on solving technology problems, or completing projects.  But I have really come to believe that the way that we work with people is as important as the "final" outcome. We might be able to build the most wizz-bang amazing website ever (in a technological sense) but if we haven't really thought about how we moved through the project, never evaluated how the project really went, and didn't learn from the process, in the end, the project wasn't the success it seemed to be. In fact, it's amazing how much we can learn from projects that might be considered failures by technological criteria. In the last few months, I was involved in helping three organizations choose vendors for varied technology projects, and in the course of that time, I talked with almost a dozen technology vendors of one type or another. One question I asked all of them was about whether they had a process of reflection and evaluation of their work, as it was going on, and when the project was coming to a close. Unfortunately, none of them had an answer to that question. That is something I would love to see change.

Comments

What great questions to ask,

What great questions to ask, Michelle! Hopefully the fact that you asked gets people to realize that it's something important to do. I'd love to see that as part of the criteria for evaluating a vendor--what is their process for evaluating themselves. I'd also love to see things like "how do you ensure that your staff are continuing to develop professionally and have up-to-date skills?" But that may be a personal pipe dream. ;-)

Most of the units that I have

Most of the units that I have completed in my course (Grad Dip Science Communication) have included a small assignment entitled "Reflection". I have found this invaluable as a way to move forward in my course of study.

Also, in the middle of last year I participated in a 'Running Small Group Sessions' workshop. This session also stressed that self-reflection, perhaps 15 min writing in a journal or log was a way of "asking for feedback".

Recently when searching for peer-reviewed science communication journals I came across Using a self reflective journal to enhance science communication. This got me thinking that all people, not just scientists and students could use this method.

Add new comment